• Advertisement

Persecuting Men for Social Justice!

Persecuting men for social justice is what yet another scumbag Democratic Party politician wants to do. “Preponderance of the evidence” is not enough in terms of bias and presumption against men. This mangina wants to adopt a 20 percent get-men-at-all-costs test.

Rep. Jared Polis Thinks Colleges Should Be Able to Expel Students When They’re Only 20% Sure a Rape HappenedIn a follow-up interview with Reason, Polis explains why he wants to let colleges expel innocent men.


Forget preponderance of evidence—Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colorado) wonders why campus rape adjudicators don’t use an even lower standard of proof and expel students in cases where there is only a 20 percent chance that they are guilty.

Polis made this shocking remark during a House Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Training hearing on campus sexual assault prevention Thursday morning. The hearing featured a Q and A session between lawmakers and campus rape experts—most of whom were dismissive of concerns that the campus adjudication process was unfriendly to the due process rights of accused students (the exception being Foundation for Individual Rights lawyer Joseph Cohn).

Toward the end of the hearing, several panelists noted that they preferred the “preponderance of evidence” standard, which holds that a student should be found guilty of sexual assault if adjudicators decide it is more likely than not he committed the crime. This standard is “the most equitable” one, they said: it establishes identical burdens for accusers and the accused.

I could go into all the ways this idea is wrong and flies in the face of liberal Western notions about justice and fairness—whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? Not equitable, alas—but it’s actually a downright reasonable position, considering what Polis advocated moments later. He said:

“It certainly seems reasonable that a school for its own purposes might want to use a preponderance of evidence standard, or even a lower standard. Perhaps a likelihood standard…. If I was running a (private college) I might say, well, even if there is only a 20 or 30 percent chance that it happened, I would want to remove this individual.”

Woman discovers ‘boyfriend’ of two years is woman when she removes blindfold during sex. Woman has blindfolded sex with ‘male cancer patient ashamed of scars’ – before discovering it is female friend using prosthetic penis, court hears.
This story should be retitled “Dumbest chick ever” lol.
Describing what she said was their last sexual encounter before she went to the police, she said: “When I was having sex I grabbed for the back of his head and my hand got caught on something. It did not feel right.
“I was sat on the bed, he was standing up. Something in my mind said ‘pull it (the blindfold) off, pull it off’. I just pulled it off. Gayle was just standing there… I just couldn’t believe it, I couldn’t believe it. Straight away she held her hand down over her face and said ‘it’s not what you think’.”
The trial continues.


aurini swag

Special thanks to Adam S, Colin S, Jason B, Daniel T, William the Iconoclast, Peter N, and Valentino Vals.

This entry was posted in alcohol, Democratic Party, false allegations, politics, progressives, Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


  • Cool Amazon Stuff!

  • Advertisement